The expense of vaping should be reduced for smokers in developing countries as an urgent “human rights issue”, researchers have told a pro-tobacco conference in London.
Addressing a 300-strong audience of tobacco and vaping industry representatives, Helen Redmond, a specialist in substance use at New York University’s Silver School of Social Work, said individuals poor countries must not be priced away from nicotine-based products that could help them to to give up smoking.
Redmond compared the medicinal qualities of nicotine with cannabis and stressed “the need to get vaping towards the poorest, who require it most”.
“It’s a human rights issue – as being a harm reduction device, prices need to come down,” she said. “Nicotine will not be a dirty drug, it helps with depression and anxiety.”
Academics at the 2018 global tobacco and nicotine forum called for additional research to the possible medical benefits of nicotine along with a focus on the progression of innovative nicotine-based products which will provide a “smoke-free society” and lower the harmful effects of cigarettes.
Viscount Matt Ridley, an author and member of your home of Lords, joined the chorus of experts promoting vaping as a kind of harm reduction, arguing that subjecting best disposable electronic cigarette towards the same workplace restrictions as smoking might be considered an infringement of an individual’s human rights.
“We should treat vaping in a similar manner we treat access to cellphones,” said Ridley. “The the easy way get people to give up [smoking] is always to innovate with technology”.
Ridleytold the conference that, despite the industry’s continued give attention to promoting nicotine-based products as a kind of harm reduction, public opinion was moving away from vaping as a result of media “scare stories”. He compared the industry’s plight, in particular in the united states, for that faced by “bootleggers and baptists during prohibition”.
Clive Bates, director of advocacy group Counterfactual, described the views of anti-tobacco campaigners as “hostile and focused”, accusing them of getting rival commercial interests with a goal of “annihilating” the industry. Warning in the damage caused by “those using a vested interest in causing alarm”, he stated that while critics laboured to produce evidence to “maintain the narrative of harm”, technological advances meant the transition to vape-type products was very likely to become mandatory instead of voluntary.
You can find 1.1 billion smokers worldwide and 6 million die annually as a direct reaction to smoking. An additional 890,000 people per year die prematurely as a result of second-hand smoke, according to the World Health Organization.
A single cigarette contains more than 200 carcinogenic chemicals, as well as the addictive stimulant nicotine. Scientists and academics have so far did not reach agreement on benefits and drawbacks of long term nicotine use.
With a plenary session, clinical psychologist Karl Fagerström called for research to the positive benefits associated with nicotine, that he believes can help people suffering from Alzheimer’s and depression. Also, he advised wgferg the industry should move from combustible to nicotine-based products.
“No the first is considering establishing what the advantages of smoking nicotine are,” Fagerström said.
Martin Jarvis, professor of health psychology at University College London, saidthe US was moving towards prohibition-type enforcement, with the Food and Drug Administration keen to reduce the amount of nicotine in cigarettes.
“Society doesn’t understand nicotine,” said Jarvis, “because they believe it is particularly bad.”
But Jarvis said “describing nicotine to be addictive is justified”, adding that “80% of smokers wished they never started”.